Can There be too Much Action?

I watched the first 2 episodes of a new TV series this week,  Missing with Ashley Judd.   The premise is interesting, a former CIA agent’s college-age son is kidnapped in Europe.  Kick-butt single mom (Ashley Judd) will do anything to find him.  In episode 1, she storms across Rome and Paris, kicking assassin tail and taking foreign agent names.  All good stuff.

(Not Ashely Judd)

Last night I tackled episode 2. Of the forty-off minutes of play time, it seemed like forty of them were action. Fight scenes, some impressive wall-scaling, a motorcycle chase,  running, shooting, etc.  I love action, but in episode 2, I was hoping for some background on our kick-butt single mom, some character development beyond the I-will-do-anything-to-save-my-son-premise, which is well-established in episode 1.

I love Ashley Judd. She isn’t running around Europe in designer clothes or trying to navigate old cobblestones in 5 inch stilettos.  She looks like a suburban mom.  So, I will likely give the show a few more episodes. But even I need something more than pure, non-stop action.

Has anyone else seen the show?  Can there be too much action?

My Scrivener Update

I promised an update on my switch from manual story-boarding to the oh-so-organized Scrivener.  I started my new project on the new software two weeks ago.  And got absolutely nowhere with it.

My lack of progress was only partly due to the software, which has excellent capabilities but felt very cumbersome to me.

Corkboard was awesome. I love the way it interacts with the document.  My story-board and desk are always a complete mess by the time hit the middle of a book. Unfortunately, corkboard was the only thing I liked about Scrivener. Maybe it was the PC version, but the software was annoyingly laggy on both my desktop and my brand new laptop.  I’d type a sentence, but the words wouldn’t appear on the screen for a second or two.  This drove me crazy.

Next, I assumed that sticking the basics wouldn’t involve much of a learning curve, and that only advanced features would be difficult. I was wrong. Doing any sort of formatting was overly complicated.  I’d need to take a course or buy a book and devote several weeks to learning how to use the program. Keep in mind that I’m a geek. I alter the CSS stylesheet of my WordPress website. The formatting difficulties made my document appear messy. This also drove me nuts. Yes, I realize I sound very, uhm, particular, but I like to look at a tidy document. I like a certain font. I like to know exactly how many pages I’ve written, etc. What can I say. I am what I am.

OK, now here’s the weirdest thing. Frankly, I missed my color-coded note cards. I missed scribbling on them. I missed pinning them up on my story-board. The electronic experience just wasn’t the same as shuffling through the cards manually or moving them around on the wall board. Maybe it’s the tactile experience or the movement involved, but the virtual corkboard didn’t prompt my brain activity the same way.

All in all, during the first two weeks of working on my newest book, I wrote very little. Since switching back to my sloppy and seemingly chaotic but actually very organized system, I’ve roughly outlined the first three chapters, from inciting incident to first turning point. I’ve also identified the mid-point and defined much of the resolution. (The book’s climax was always clear.)

So, I know many, many people who LOVE Scrivener, but it’s not for me. I’m back to scribbling on index cards and appreciating them more than ever.

Fight Scene Pet Peeves

Here is another of the questions we were asked in that interview that we previously mentioned here on Attacking the Page and I thought you might find our answers interesting and useful.

 

What mistakes do you see writers make when describing fights that really annoy you because they’re so unrealistic? 

Melinda’s answer: Having a woman punch a man in the face or trade blows with a man. The size and mass just don’t add up. Fact: men hit harder than women, and women break easier than men.

Kathy Adds:  I have to respectfully disagree with Melinda’s fact. While generally men hit harder and women break easier, it’s not an absolute.  Not all men hit harder than all women and not all women break easier than men.  I believe it’s dependent on the man and woman’s bone density, size, mass, speed of their weapons (punches, chops, kicks) and technique.  One of my pet peeves in reading a fight scene is when the author takes too long to describe an action on the page.  It slows down the visual image in my minds eye and therefore slows the pacing.  A fight is fast and the action should be conveyed quickly.  I also hate when an author adds too much silly description that no one would ever notice while fighting.  I had a blog post on this but can seem to find it. sorry.

Melinda adds: I suppose Kathy is going to make me work harder here. <grin> While I totally concur with Kathy’s correct assertion (above) that small, weak men and large, strong women do exist, in general men’s bones tend to be thicker, especially the femur, forehead and jaw. The difference is pronounced enough than bone thickness is one of the parameters that forensic anthropologists use to determine gender in skeletons. If a woman encounters a man on the street, he is likely to be bigger and stronger. I have a friend who was punched in the face by a man. With one blow, he broke her nose, cheek, and eye socket. Both were average sized for their respective genders with no training. He, however, was extremely aggressive and put everything he had into the punch. She required surgery to repair the damage.

Though, with Kathy’s statement in mind, it’s important to note that nutrition and lifestyle (ie physical labor, athletics) also affect bone density. A large woman who eats well and grew up on a farm performing physical labor all her life might have denser bones than a geeky guy who lives on candy and sits at a computer all day.

Kathy is also spot-on in regards to skill. In training Jiu-Jitsu, I’ve done a fair amount of grappling (ground fighting similar to wrestling). Even men the same size as me were stronger. But here’s an interesting observation from my Jiu-Jitsu instructor: women tend to have better or “more textbook” technique than men because they know they can’t rely on their strength. They must apply leverage 100% correctly 100% of the time for it to work. This also applies to small men who routinely grapple with larger, stronger guys.

Rayna’s thoughts: I have to agree with Kathy on the description in the middle of a fight scene. Seriously, no one is going to wax poetic about the sunset when they are trying to keep from getting beat up or worse. Now, they might notice the sunset if it was blinding them and making the fight more difficult. That I would buy and it only needs to be a quick off-hand comment.

Looking for Action

Passive voice. It’s every writer’s enemy. If you’ve ever had to write book reports or term papers with any degree of regularity, the telling style of writing is something that is hammered into you. With the analysis type papers we write in school it’s all about tell, tell, tell. Writing in passive voice can become so automatic we slip into it in our fiction. All that manages to do is create a very slow ,tedious read.

Fiction writing is all about the active voice. We want to show not tell so that our readers are in the action, seeing it unfold. Writing inactive voice is all about crafting the scene so that it comes to life in the readers mind.  We don’t want narrators to run amok explaining the events that unfold.  After all, this is a book not a dissertation. With that being said, I’m going to use an excerpt from my current WIP to demonstrate my point and give you a before and after shot.

The Original Scene

Thank god for decent night vision, Adrian thought as he navigated his way to the suite’s bathroom. Lee slept soundly and he didn’t want to turn on a bright room light and awaken him. Closing the door behind him, he flipped on the bathroom light revealing a sizable room that had black granite counters and floor tiles, a jacuzzi tube that could fit three people, and a little alcove for the toilet. He took a minute to study himself in the mirror that covered the wall from counter top to ceiling and stared in amused wonder at the variety of markings that Leland had left on his body. Lee had always been a territorial sort. He used the bathroom, then exited to go check in with North since he’d been out of touch all afternoon. The blow came out of the darkness. He heard the rustle of clothing mere moments before the blow landed and was able to deflect the first blow, but didn’t react in time to completely block the second. The knife his attacker wielded sliced his forearm. Pain radiated up Adrian’s arm from the slice, in the at instance he knew something wasn’t right. 

Rather blah if I do say so myself. Lots of telling, internalization, and unnecessary description.  I’m telling the reader about the action instead of putting the reader in the middle of it. The scene was full of he felt, he saw, he heard. All of this is telling which distances the reader from the story and slows the overall pace. That’s certainly not something that you want especially not when it’s building toward a fight scene and you really don’t want to slow the pacing of the actual fight scene with telling. Now try the scene again after two rounds of rewrites.

The Edited Version

“Thank  god for decent night vision.” Adrian padded to the suite’s bathroom. The hinges gave a soft squeak and he cringed, frozen in place. He glanced back over his shoulder toward the king sized bed. Lee’s face stayed buried in the pillow. Adrian let out the breath he’d been holding. He really didn’t want to dive into round two of messed up relationship discussions. Sleeping with Lee wasn’t one of his better ideas, but once Lee had kissed him he couldn’t have stopped if he’d wanted.

He eased the door shut and flipped on the lights, squinting as the over bright blast assailed his eyes. He took a minute to study himself in the mirror that covered half of the wall.

“Damn Lee,” he murmured. The cold granite pressed into his stomach as he leaned in to the counter as he poked at the variety of markings that Leland had left on his body. “I look like the victim of a vacuum run amok.”  He turned trying to get a look at the injury on his back. No more pain, but the flesh remained a bit raw and pink.

 He used the bathroom, then washed up. He needed to call Chris. He hadn’t checked in all afternoon. He eased the door open and reached to flick off the light, as he did a rustle of fabric caught his attention. He whirled in time to see the glint of a blade as it arced toward him. He deflect the first strike, but he didn’t react in time to completely block the second . The knife his attacker wielded sliced his forearm.

“Leland. Grab your phone and get the hell out of here. Now!” He yelled. His strength seemed to wane and an odd tingling sensation grew with every blow he landed. Something wasn’t right.

See the difference? Instead of telling you what Adrian heard, you’re hearing it with him,  feeling his emotions with him, etc. I’ve also sped up the pacing, made the scene flow better,  and made the page easier to read by having smaller chunks of text instead of massive paragraphs.

What other tips and tricks to you have for shifting a scene from passive to active. Believe me I need all the help I can get.

~Rayna

 

Opening and Closing Images

In Save the Cat! The Last Book On Screen Writing That You’ll Ever Need, Blake Snyder discusses the opening image as the very first impression of what a movie (or novel) is – it sets the tone, mood, and style of the movie. It introduces the main character by giving us a “before snapshot” prior to his life-changing journey we paid $10 to see. Snyder goes on to say that the final image should match the opening image. It’s the “after snapshot” and should show us how the hero grew or changed.

He uses Miss Congeniality as an example. “Opening Image: Sandra Bullock’s character in flashback as a playground tough. The image is Sandra surrounded by boys. Sandra is a tomboy and she’s beating them up. Sandra has issues. When we CUT TO: The Present, Sandra is still surrounded by boys, still a tomboy, but she’s an FBI agent, at home in the world of men – kind of.  Final image: Miss Congeniality closes with the opposite of the opening image: Sandra is surrounded by women. Sandra is awarded the coveted Miss Congeniality Award by her fellows – quite a change!”

Okay, I see this. I understand this. It makes a lot of sense. BUT…then I read his next book, Save the Cat goes to the Movies, in which Snyder gives tons of examples of movies and breaks them down into his 15 beats. However, I found that most of the examples didn’t demonstrate a clear change in the characters from just viewing the opening image (beat 1) and closing images (beat 15).

For example, in Lethal Weapon Snyder writes, “Opening Image: Night. Atop a high-rise in LA, a girl does a line of coke and jumps out the window, plummeting to her death. Final Image: Having come to terms with his wife’s death, Mel Spends Christmas with Danny and his family. Danny is over his mid-life crisis, and Mel is no longer an insane person.”

I’m not seeing the bookends of the opening and closing image. Am I missing something? Many of the examples are like this. So how important is it to have a true “before” and “after” snapshot in the first and final images of a movie or novel? Does it matter as long as you can see the character growth over the course of the movie or book? I’d love to hear your thoughts on this.

~K.M. Fawcett

An Action Packed Two Years

It’s been two years and four days since we started blogging about martial arts, writing and action. Happy Anniversary, Attacking The Page readers! We hope you’ve found our posts useful, interesting, and entertaining.

Thank you so much for spending time with us every Monday and Thursday. Thank you for celebrating our successes (publishing contracts) and consoling us when disappointments (rejections) strike. Thank you for your comments and community. Hearing from you is what makes the blog so much fun.

On that note, please let us know in the comments section what you enjoy most/ least about our blog so we can improve for next year. Perhaps there are topics that interest you that you’d like to see more often. Are there any special guests you’d like to see? Do you enjoy the video clips we play or do you not watch them? Do you want more safety tips? Did you like the action scene critique? We’d love to hear your thoughts.

I still can’t believe another year has come and gone. Thanks again for sharing it with Melinda, Rayna and me. Happy Anniversary ATP readers!

~ K.M. Fawcett

Book in a Week Update

So…

I don’t think Book-in-a-Week is for me.  I’ve spent the last three days writing and deleting a lot of words only to decide the story didn’t begin in the right place.  I need to start over. Maybe BIAW would work after I’ve established my 1st three chapters, but to start off with the pressure of typing many, many words each day, no matter how wrong my brain knows they are, just doesn’t work for me. I have discovered that I am NOT a pantser. I need structure. I don’t need to know everything that’s going to happen in the book. Subplots might arise as I move alone, but I need a clear direction and story goals to get off to the right start.

Yesterday I abandoned any attempt to write actual scenes and began a synopsis. Today I’ll continue to work on that, plus work on my character sketches. Deb Dixon’s GMC: Goal, Motivation, and Conflict will likely be addressed, also my personal favorite story structure guide, Syd Field’s The Foundations of Screenwriting.

Does anyone else know of any beginning-the-book resources?  Books on plotting or character development that maybe I haven’t read yet.  What’s your go-to tool for story structure?

 

 

Off to a Rough Start

I turned in a book to my editor last week.  Yay!  I also completed the first round of edits on Midnight Exposure, my June release.  There was much rejoicing in my household.

Now for the rub. I have to start my next project, and it can’t be the usual willy-nilly-whatever-pops-into-my-head.  Midnight Exposure ends with an open thread.  It’s begging for the sequel to be written.

But ready, set, write doesn’t always work for me.  I sat down to start a rough outline. A few ideas have been rumbling around in my head.  Thanks to book 1 in the series, my villain’s character arc jumped up and waved at me.  I also know the event that will comprise the black moment.  My main characters already exist, though they must be fleshed out.  I know what needs to happen. It’s the how that’s eluding me.

I like to start a book with action, jump right into an event that gets the whole ball rolling, so to speak. Unfortunately, the beginning of the book has eluded me for the past week. Part of the problem is rooted in the final weeks of the last project.  I was working till midnight every night, so caught up in the flow that I couldn’t stop until the book was finished. My brain is fried.

Enter outside help. Like magic, an email from Kiss of Death (the romantic suspense chapter of Romance Writers of America) appeared in my in-bin. An online Book in a Week class was forming.

An imaginary bright light illuminated my office. A choir of angels burst into the hallelujah chorus.  I signed up on the spot.  24 hours later, I receive a two articles, one with a cliffnote summary of Deb Dixon’s all time classic Goal, Motivation, and Conflict (GMC). The other was a quick plotting guide.  I immediately print them out and read. With some focus, my reluctant brain cells chug into action. Ideas form. Not great ones yet, but better than nothing.

For the uninitiated, Book-in-a-Week (BIAW) is an insane attempt to write an entire book in seven days. I know I don’t write that fast, but I’ll be happy if I can just jump-start this project. I’ll spend the next couple of days completing a GMC chart for each main character and doing the exercises in the speed plotting article.  I’ll post my progress on Thursday, day 4 of the BIAW.  Cross your fingers for me.

Has anyone else fried their brain finishing a project?  Does anyone else have any ideas for getting a new book off the ground?  And how many writers belong to writing organizations and NEVER take advantage of the resources they offer (sheepishly raising hand)?

Lady Jane’s Salon and LSF Writers Con

I’ve been swamped over the last few days trying to make sure that I’ve taken care of as many details as possible so that that LSF Writers’ conference this coming weekend is a a success. To that end, this post will be a bit of blatant promotion.

If you’re in the Iselin, NJ area, please join us on Saturday for our multi-author book signing. The Book Fair at the Create Something Magical Conference is open to the general public and will be held from 5:30 to 7:00 pm in the Crystal B and C Ballrooms at the Renaissance Woodbridge Hotel, 515 Route 1 South & Gill Lane Iselin, New Jersey.

Meet and greet over 30 authors in various genres during the book fair and pick up some books to add to your To-Be-Read pile. Many thanks to Watchung Booksellers for helping us with the book fair sales!

Here’s a flyer with conference details and a list of signing authors.

If you can’t be there in person you can still join in the fun. LSF Writers , Avon Romance, and Lady Jane’s Salon will be doing a Live Streaming event. We’ll be broadcasting this special addition of Lady Jane’s Salon featuring Katharine Ashe, Sarah MacLean, and Maya Rodale over the internet. The event starts this Saturday, March 17th, at 12:30 pm. Here’s a link so you can watch the readings and ask your questions of these three talented authors.

http://www.livestream.com/romance

We do hope you’ll try and join us either in person or virtually.

Now, I have get back to the conference prep. See you Saturday!

~Rayna

 

 

 

Elements of a Good Critique Partnership

I am very fortunate. I have an awesome critique partner. Melinda won’t hesitate to tell me when I’ve gotten it right, and at the same time she’ll tell me when I’m stinking up the page. I like to think I offer the same to her. What makes our partnership work? There are many factors involved in finding the right critique match, but here are just a few things that work for us.

First, and most important, is trust. Without that you’re finished before you start. You’re putting your work in your partner’s hands in the hopes of receiving honest feedback and help in improving not just your manuscript, but also your overall craft. Bottom line trust is vital.

Complimentary skill sets are a plus. Both Melinda and I bring something different to the table. Things that I tend to be completely escape my notice she’ll pick up on and vice versus.

Have a thick skin. Being in the publishing industry, you’re going to need one anyway. You’re going to need to be able to take constructive criticism whether it comes from your critique partner or your editor. On the other hand, a good critique partner won’t try and tear you down or make you feel bad about your work. A good critique partnership is about mutual respect and honest input.

Be honest with each other. When I send pages to Melinda, I’ll tell her to tear it to shreds. Why? First, because the only way I’ll improve the story and my skills is if I have someone combing through it with a critical eye. Second, I know that the dissection will be done thoughtfully and with respect. Third, because she may have suggestions that would never occurred to me.

You don’t have to write in the same genre, but it helps to be a familiar with the genre your partner writes. A critique partner who is not familiar with your genre may be able to offer suggestions on the basic technical skills of writing, but not the nuances of the genre.

Communication is key. If you don’t feel that you can offer a helpful critique you need to let your partner know. For example, I write M/M romance. I realize it’s not going to be everyone’s cup of tea. Before I started sending chapters to Melinda or before I send to a Beta reader I let them know up front the nature of the story. I never want to send someone something they are not comfortable reading. Also, if life has gotten crazy, you need to let your partner know what kind of turn around time you can give them.

Celebrate each other’s accomplishments and be supportive when disappointments happen. Your partner will most likely be the one you turn to when things happen along your publication journey. It’s nice to have someone one to support you who also understands what you’re going through.

These are just a few suggestions of what makes a good critique partner. Do you have any other to add to the list?

~Rayna